Agency research file · Candidate

Guidea

Digital health UX and complex-domain product design. This research file links to agency work and other records that help verify specific claims. It is not a recommendation or a ranking.

UI/UX Design UX Research Enterprise UX

Research status

First-pass source leads · candidate profile only. These links are starting points for checking the stated claims; they have not all been revalidated for this release.

Research note: Guidea was acquired by Invene in 2025. The cited Clutch record and portfolio describe Guidea’s studio practice; confirm which team and contracting entity would deliver new work.

Region is a broad service-area label, not a verified headquarters claim. Check the linked source record before relying on location details.

Candidate research · source links are first-pass leads and have not all been rechecked for this release. Directory details and review counts can change.

Areas to investigate

These are profile-specific questions for the next evidence pass. They identify what public material still needs to establish before a capability is treated as confirmed.

Clinical and patient UX

Which products and populations are covered, and what clinical or safety requirements shaped design?

Evidence to look for

User roles, validation, accessibility, and agency contribution.

Health outcome claims

Are NPS, adoption, or patient outcomes independently measured and linked to this work?

Evidence to look for

Client measurement source, baseline, timeframe, and attribution limits.

Enterprise software

Which enterprise projects shipped and what were Guidea’s system responsibilities?

Evidence to look for

Client-confirmed scope and deployment evidence.

Related research categories: UI/UX Design · UX Research · Enterprise UX

Project evidence

The sources above include portfolio and directory records. Individual projects need checks for client relationship, agency role, project scope, and launch status before they can be described as verified project evidence.

Read how we assess project evidence →

Sources and evidence

These are first-pass source leads. Follow each link and confirm that it still supports the claim before relying on it. Agency portfolios are self-published; client, review, and award records have different evidentiary limits.

Guidea digital health practice and named examples ↗Claim to check: Practice page describes regulated SaMD, behavioral health, payer and provider software, and named partnerships including Evernorth/Cigna and WellDoc. This is an agency portfolio overview rather than a project-level case; FDA and outcome claims need product-specific corroboration.Publisher: Guidea · Not rechecked for this release
Agency-published portfolio / case study
Guidea on Clutch ↗Claim to check: A verified Proov executive review describes user research, audience segmentation, and UX/UI design for a fertility product and app. Client-reported product sales and NPS in the review are not independently audited; this records one project, not the whole portfolio.Publisher: Clutch · Not rechecked for this release
Client-review and business directory
Guidea acquisition announcement ↗Claim to check: Acquirer announcement says Guidea joined Invene in 2025, combining product strategy/design with healthcare engineering. Corporate announcement; the profile retains the known Guidea studio name but should explain its current ownership/context.Publisher: Invene · Not rechecked for this release
Acquirer announcement

Corrections

Know of a direct source that changes this file? Send the specific claim and a link so it can be reviewed.

Report a correction →